V These cases also present the question whether the Constitution requires States to recognize same-sex marriages validly performed out of State. As made clear by the case of Obergefell and Arthur, and by that of DeKoe and Kostura, the recognition bans inflict substantial and continuing harm on same-sex couples Overview. Obergefell v. Hodges is a landmark case in which on June 26, 2015, the Supreme Court of the United States held, in 5-4 decision, that state bans on same-sex marriage and on recognizing same sex marriages duly performed in other jurisdictions are unconstitutional under the Due Process and Equal Protection clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution
View Obergefell v. Hodges Case Brief.docx from BLAW 371 at University of Nebraska, Lincoln. Obergefell v. Hodges Facts o Groups of same-sex couples sued their state agencies in Ohio, Michigan CASE SUMMARY: OBERGEFELL V. HODGES On January 16, 2015, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in DeBoer v. Snyder,1 a case in which the Sixth Circuit upheld laws in Kentucky, Tennessee, Ohio, and Michigan banning same-sex marriage and the recognition of out-of-state same-sex marriages.2 And on June 26 After the Obergefell decision, more LGBT people were happy (87%) Brief . The Economic Impact of Marriage Equality Five Years after Obergefell v. Hodges . May 2020. Fact Sheet . Legally Married LGB People in the United States . June 2019. The Impact of Obergefell v.. Get more case briefs explained with Quimbee. Quimbee has over 16,300 case briefs (and counting) keyed to 223 casebooks https://www.quimbee.com/case-briefs-.. Obergefell v. Hodges, legal case in which the U.S. Supreme Court ruled (5-4) on June 26, 2015, that state bans on same-sex marriage and on recognizing same-sex marriages duly performed in other jurisdictions are unconstitutional under the due process and equal protection clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.. The two questions presented by the case—the.
.Hodges, 576 U.S. (2015).Facts: Groups of the same sex couples sued their relevant state agencies in Ohio, Kentucky, Michigan, and Tennessee to challenge the constitutionality of those states bans on the same sex marriage or refusal to recognize legal same sex marriages that occurred in jurisdiction that provide for such marriages v. HODGES OBERGEFELL Syllabus . Finally, this Court's cases and the Nation's traditions make clear that marriage is a keystone of the Nation's social order. See . Maynard. v. Hill, 125 U. S. 190, 211. States have contributed to the fundamental character of marriage by placing it at the center of many facets of the legal and social order
Obergefell v. Hodges, 576 U.S. 644 (2015) (/ ˈ oʊ b ər ɡ ə f ɛ l / OH-bər-gə-fel), is a landmark civil rights case in which the Supreme Court of the United States ruled that the fundamental right to marry is guaranteed to same-sex couples by both the Due Process Clause and the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution 5-4 decision for Obergefellmajority opinion by Anthony M. Kennedy. The Fourteenth Amendment requires both marriage licensing and recognition for same-sex couples. Yes, yes. Justice Anthony M. Kennedy delivered the opinion for the 5-4 majority. The Court held that the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment guarantees the right to marry.
Himes with Obergefell v. Himes, another Ohio case, for purposes of submission. Obergefell also seeks recognition of out-of-state marriages in Ohio. August 2014 Oral arguments on the consolidated Ohio marriage cases occur, alongside cases from Michigan, Kentucky, and Tennessee. Cases from two of the other states include claims for marriage. The Supreme Court's decision in Obergefell resolved the outstanding cases that were then-pending in U.S. Courts of Appeals throughout the country. As discussed in previous reports, APA also filed amicus briefs in cases in the 1st, 4th, 5th, 6th, 7th, 8th, 9th, and 11th Circuits prior to the Obergefell decision Obergefell v. Hodges. Holding: The Fourteenth Amendment requires a state to license a marriage between two people of the same sex and to recognize a marriage between two people of the same sex when their marriage was lawfully licensed and performed out-of-state. Judgment: Reversed, 5-4, in an opinion by Justice Kennedy on June 26, 2015 judgment approach employed in Obergefell v. Hodges, 576 U.S. 644, 664 (2015), according to which [h]istory and tradition guide and discipline th[e] inquiry but do not set its outer boundaries. That approach is premised on the understanding that the traditional judicial virtues of reasoned, knowledgeable, and consistent decision Jim Campbell: With 5-4 gay marriage decision, battle far from over (USA Today, 2015-06-26) Audio and transcript: U.S. Supreme Court oral arguments in Obergefell v. Hodges - Question 1 (2015-04-28) Audio and transcript: U.S. Supreme Court oral arguments in Obergefell v. Hodges - Question 2 (2015-04-28) SCOTUSblog docket page: Obergefell v. Hodges
Obergefell v. Hodges. Brief Filed: 5/1/2014 Court: 6th Circuit Court of Appeals in the event he died before the court could consider the case. Arthur died on Oct. 22, 2013. Id. at 59-60. APA's amicus briefs filed in the Sixth Circuit urged this conclusion. Plaintiffs filed a petition for a writ of certiorari in the United States Supreme. I wanted to share some facts surrounding the case. The case relates to the states of Ohio, Kentucky, Michigan, and Tennessee where same-sex couples have sued the state for refusing to recognize legal marriages in other states. Facts: Obergefell v. Hodges involves James Obergefell and John Arthur James from Ohio This historic case, Obergefell v.Hodges, consolidated four same-sex marriage cases from Ohio, Tennessee, Michigan and Kentucky and picked up where the 2013 case United States v. Windsor left off. In Windsor, the court ruled that part of HR 3396 - Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) was unconstitutional but did not address the constitutionality of same-sex marriage Obergefell v. Hodges (Case Brief) 1. F acts. Fou rteen same-sex cou ples and t wo men, w ho same-sex partners had passed away, br ought. suits against t he states Mich i gan, K entuc ky, Ohio, and T ennessee. The plaint i ffs argue t hat. their home st ates are violating t he Due Process c lause and the Equal Pr otection Clause of the Richard Hodges replaced Mr. Himes as Defendant after being appointed Director of the Ohio Department of Health in August 2014. On April 24, 2014 Appellee Obergefell filed the Appellee Brief. Appellant Himes filed a Reply Brief on May 12, 2014. During this period, numerous amicus briefs were filed to support each side
Hodges Case Summary and Significance - FindLaw. Obergefell v. Hodges Case Summary and Significance. In Obergefell v. Hodges, the Supreme Court held that states must recognize marriages between same-sex couples. The case was narrowly decided on a 5-4 vote, with Justice Anthony Kennedy issuing the swing vote and writing the opinion for the majority Leilani Dickinson Case Brief: Obergefell v. Hodges. Procedural History: Several same sex couples from Michigan, Kentucky, Ohio and Tennessee appealed the United States court of appeals decision states had no constitutional obligation to uphold a opposite sex marriage nor one performed out of state, making it void some states.. Statement of Fact
April 3, 2015. Obergefell v. Hodges is a case before the U.S. Supreme that will determine whether states have the right to define marriage and to decide whether to recognize same-sex marriages as performed in another state. The National Association of Evangelicals joined an amici brief with the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, The Church of. Hodges. On June 26, 2015, the U.S. Supreme Court handed down a landmark decision in the case of Obergefell v. Hodges, recognizing that same-sex couples have access to the same marriage rights as their opposite-sex counterparts throughout the country. All state laws banning same-sex marriage were overruled by the Court's decision Obergefell v. Hodges, 576 U.S. ___ (2015), was a watershed case in American history, granting same-sex couples the right to marry nationwide. James Obergefell lived in Ohio with his partner, John Arthur. The couple wanted to get married, but at the time, the State of Ohio forbade same-sex marriage . Flashcards. Learn. Write. Spell. Test. PLAY. Match. Gravity. Created by. Erinldunn. Terms in this set (5) Facts of the Case. In 2015, Michigan, Kentucky, Ohio, and Tennessee still defined marriage as a union between a man and a woman, 14 same-sex couples and 2 widows of a same-sex partner filed suit in their.
A decision in the case, Obergefell v. Hodges, was issued on June 26, 2015. Read the ruling here. Party Briefs to SCOTUS. Obergefell v. Hodges involved cases from four states, where plaintiffs were seeking the freedom to marry or respect for their marriages legally performed in other states. In the spring of 2015, all parties sounded off with. Obergefell v. Hodges / Vocabulary. Links for Files. It will also give you access to hundreds of additional resources and Supreme Court case summaries! We apologize for any inconvenience, but hope that having only one Street Law account to remember will make your life easier 1 Case Summary Obergefell et al. v. Hodges, Director, Ohio Department of Health, et al. 576 US (2015) 1. Reference details Jurisdiction: Supreme Court of the United State The cases were: Obergefell v. Hodges, Tanco v. Haslam, DeBoer v. Snyder, and Bourke v. Beshear. Decided by Obergefell on June 26, 2015, it was declared that same-sex couples have the constitutional rights to marry and to have their marriages recognized. Obergefell therefore overturned th
No. 14-556, 14-562, 14-571, 14-574 In the Supreme Court of the United States _____ JAMES OBERGEFELL, et al., Petitioners, v. RICHARD HODGES, et al., Respondents. [Additional Case Captions Listed Inside Front Cover Obergefell v Hodges: Marriage Equality at the Supreme Court Victory. She stood on behalf of petitioners April DeBoer and Jayne Rowse in the Michigan case DeBoer v. Brief of Amici Curiae 167 Members of the U.S. House of Representatives et al. in Support of Petitioner Obergefell v. Hodges: Same-Sex Marriage Legalized Congressional Research Service Summary On June 26, 2015, the Supreme Court issued its decision in Obergefell v. Hodges requiring states to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples and to recognize same-sex marriages that were legally formed in other states Obergefell v. Hodges (2015) is commonly referred to as the same-sex marriage case that legalized same-sex marriage at the federal level in the United States. While this is true, it is more accurate to state that the Supreme Court decision determined that it is unconstitutional for a state to refuse giving a marriage license to a same-sex couple (Obergefell v
She was due at the nation's highest court to argue Obergefell v. Hodges, a case poised to determine whether same-sex marriage is legal throughout the country. But at the moment, the renowned. Obergefell v. Hodges (2015)—ruling: The Court held that the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment guarantees the right to marry as one of the fundamental liberties it protects. The Civil Rights Movement (Slide 25) sex marriage case in the Supreme Court, Obergefell v. Hodges. 28 amicus briefs, submitted from interested groups and concerned individuals in support of either the petitioners or the respondents, were analyzed for the major points of concurrence and disagreement between the two sides. The aim of the study was to come to a more nuance Rather, Obergefell v Hodges is about liberty, the freedom to marry whom you love. As Justice Kennedy stated later in the opinion when discussing the history of marriage jurisprudence at the.
Obergefell & Henry v. Hodges, Director Ohio Dept. of Health (2015) Submitted Amicus Brief with COLAGE and Kinsey Morrison. This is the case that finally recognized the Constitutional right of same-sex partners to marry, making marriage equality the law in all states and jurisdictions. Read the Family Equality Amicus Brief in Obergefell v. Hodges On October 3, 2017, Texas Values formally asked the Texas Supreme Court to reconsider hearing a case against former Mayor Parker (and the City of Houston), who violated the Texas Constitution by issuing same-sex benefits long before the U.S. Supreme Court's Obergefell v Hodges same-sex marriage ruling CONCERNING OBERGEFELL V. HODGES Pursuant to the Court's Order to Show Cause of July 23, 2015 and its subsequent procedural order of August 4, 2015, Appellant Kinney hereby submits her memorandum of law regarding the impact of the decision in Obergefell v. Hodges, 576 U.S._, 2015 WL 2473451 Oune 26, 2015) on the question reported to the Cour 8 obergefell v. HODGES ALITO, J., dissenting preaching about the proper method of interpreting the Constitution or the virtues of judicial self-restraint and humility cannot compete with the temptation to achieve what is viewed as a noble end by any practicable means
Obergefell, et al. v. Hodges - Supreme Court Decision June 26, 2015; Obergefell, et al. v. Hodges - Reply Brief of Petitioners in Support of the Freedom to Marry April 17, 2015; Obergefell, et al. v. Hodges - Brief of Respondent Ohio Department of Health in Opposition to the Freedom to Marry March 27, 201 What did the Court hold in Obergefell? In a 5-4 opinion, the Supreme Court held in Obergefell v. Hodges that states must license same-sex marriages and recognize such licenses issued by other states. The decision was based on the due process and equal protection provisions of the Fourteenth Amendment Fast Facts: Obergefell v. Hodges. Case Argued: April 28, 2015. Decision Issued: June 26, 2015. Petitioner: James Obergefell and John Arthur, one of the fourteen couples who took issue with full or partial state bans on same-sex marriage. Respondent: Richard A. Hodges, Director of the Ohio Department of Health The Obergefell v. Hodges was a landmark case in which the Supreme Court, on June 26, 2015, ruled (5-4) that States need to protect same-sex marriages under the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment. Moreover, the Court deemed the ban on such marriages unconstitutional A cabinet shelf full of about one hundred and fifty briefs introduced the Justices to that question from many angles. But the actual outcome of the case known as Obergefell v. Hodges could well depend upon how the Court answers three core constitutional issues. Each by itself, in fact, could be decisive: Who decides
Obergefell v. Hodges Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained (Quimbee) Justice Thomas and Alito Defend the religious freedom of Kim Davis | Obergefell v Hodges (Another Conservative Commentator) Obergefell V. Hodges (Wiki4All) CoVfefe-45; Internet Calls BS On Trump Photos; Obergefell in PERIL & More (Waldorf Nation). Discover the best Obergefell V. Hodges books and audiobooks. Learn from Obergefell V. Hodges experts like Equality Case Files and KentFaulk. Read Obergefell V. Hodges books like Scholars of Fertility and Marriage Amicus Brief and Moore Response July 27 with a free tria United States Supreme Court ruling in the case of Obergefell v Hodges; O n Friday June 26, 2015 the United States Supreme Court ruled in the case of Obergefell v Hodges that same-sex marriage to be legal in the entire United States. A brief introduction to Hamas history Within.
Toledo Law Prof. Strang files amicus brief in Obergefell v. Hodges. April 15, 2015. Legal scholars of originalism, including Professor Lee J. Strang, filed an amicus brief in the U.S. Supreme Court's Obergefell v. Hodges, a consolidation of same-sex marriage cases.. The brief, filed in support of the respondents, addresses whether or not the Fourteenth Amendment requires a state to license a. The friend-of-the-court brief was submitted Friday in a lawsuit brought by anti-LGBT activists against the city of Houston in response to then-Mayor Annise Parker's decision to extend benefits to the same-sex spouses of city employees in 2013. Last month, the Texas Supreme Court refused to hear the case, Pidgeon v
The Presbyterian church votes to allow same-sex ceremonies. The U.S. Supreme Court decides a case that allows for same-sex marriage in 5 states (VA, OK, UT, WI, and IN) but declines to make a blanket statement for all states. 2015 - The U.S. Supreme Court makes same-sex marriages legal in all 50 states in Obergefell v. Hodges In 2017, citing the decision on Obergefell v. Hodges, the Supreme Court ruled that Arkansas had violated the 14th Amendment rights of Leigh and Jana Jacobs, and Terrah and Marisa Pavan when it did not allow the names of both mothers to appear on their children's birth certificates. In the case, Pavan v First, in 2015's Obergefell v. Hodges , the court compelled states to provide same-sex couples with the constellation of benefits linked to marriage, explicitly mentioning birth.
United States Supreme Court ruling in the case of Obergefell v Hodges FIND A SOLUTION AT Academic Writers Bay O n Friday June 26, 2015 the United States Supreme Court ruled in the case of Obergefell v Hodges that same-sex marriage to be legal in the entire United States Interestingly 18 red states, led by Alabama, have petitioned the court to intervene in the case. Also filing an amicus brief were the Attorneys General of New York, Delaware, Hawaii, Minnesota, Oregon, and Vermont, and the environmental group NRDC. Board of Education and Obergefell v. Hodges, as it too could expand the definition of a. While the Supreme Court generally did not hear cases arising from disputes regarding marriage law, they did strike down laws that prohibited interracial marriage as unconstitutional in 1967 ( Loving v. Virginia ). Starting in the 1970s, a handful of states defined marriage as between one man and one woman. In the late 20th century, LGBTQ rights. The Obergefell and Hodges case made the country bisexual. The law inspired other countries to allow same sex love. For example Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, e.c.t
See this case at CourtListener.com (May provide additional documents and, for active cases, real-time alerts) Obergefell v. Hodges SCOTUSBlog Date: Jun. 26, 2015 By: SCOTUSBlog [ External Link ] Oral Argument in Same Sex Marriage Cases Oyez.com Date: Apr. 28, 2015 By: Oyez [ External Link ] Obergefell v. Hodges Obergefell v. Hodges. (n.d.). Oyez.] The 14th Amendment is commonly known as an amendment that provides 'equal protection of the laws.'[ 14th Amendment. (n.d.). Cornell University.] The case was first granted by the Supreme Court on January 16, 2015; Argued starting April 28,anything else. 2015; and decided June 26, 2015 Amicus Briefs in Obergefell v. Hodges the U.S. Supreme Court's recent marriage equality decision Professor Peggy Davis New York University Law School The amicus brief that Professor Davis and the NYU Law School Experiential Learning Lab submitted in the Obergefell case drew on the convergent histories of marriage, race, slavery and emancipation Obergefell V. Hodges Case Study 1569 Words | 7 Pages. minorities come to pass. Of all the groups mentioned, the one that has made a more recent stride is the LGTB community, which recently has recently obtained the right to marry in every state thanks to the Obergefell v. Hodges case. Historical Timeline: The decision in the Obergefell v OBERGEFELL, DIN, AND THE FUTURE OF CONSTITUTIONAL FAMILY LAW Kerry Abramst In the summer of 2015 the United States Supreme Court handed down two groundbreaking constitutional family law decisions. One decision became famous overnight Obergefell v. Hodges declared that same-sex couples have the constitu-tional right to marry. The other, Kerry v
The brief went on to say that while Obergefell obligates the State to grant and recognize same-sex marriages, it does not bind the state courts to offer spousal benefits to gay couples. Furthermore, the brief states, this case raises important questions of federal jurisdiction and of the relationship between federal courts and state law that go. The authors are the co-authors of the forthcoming Marriage Equality: From Outlaws to In-Laws (Yale Press July/Aug. 2020).. On June 26, 2015, five years ago today, the Supreme Court held in Obergefell v.Hodges that the Fourteenth Amendment requires states to recognize marriage equality for LGBTQ+ persons. The vast literature celebrating Obergefell omits an important element of the narrative. Reviewing Respondents' Briefs in Obergefell *This is the third in a multi-post series on the parties' briefs in Obergefell v. Hodges , the consolidated same-sex marriage case Legal scholar Ruthann Robson has a very helpful post at the Constitutional Law Prof Blog summarizing all 139 amicus briefs that have been filed in Obergefell v. Hodges, the same-sex marriage case.
Following is the case brief for Obergefell v. Hodges, 135 S. Ct. 2534 (2015) Case Summary of Obergefell v. Hodges: Petitioners, a number of same-sex couples, sued four states that denied marriage licenses to those couples because those states defined marriage as being a union between one man and one woman Abstract. On June 26, 2015, a sharply divided United States Supreme Court issued its ruling in Obergefell v. Hodges, commonly known as the same sex marriage cases. Justice Anthony Kennedy, writing the majority opinion, introduced the rationale for striking down state laws that did not recognize a right to same sex marriage: a theretofore. Feminism: Obergefell v. Hodges and the Legalization of Same-Sex Marriage in Taiwan Chao-ju Chen† In 2017, Taiwan's Constitutional Court issued a decision ruling the same-sex marriage ban unconstitutional. Celebrated as a victory for mar-riage equality readying Taiwan to become the first in Asia to legaliz
Description. James Obergefell talked about Obergefell v. Hodges, the historic Supreme Court case that legalized same-sex marriage nationwide, as well the role of LGBT rights issues and marriage. Rewriting the Supreme Court's landmark gay rights decision Jack Balkin and an all-star cast of legal scholars, sitting as a hypothetical Supreme Court, rewrite the famous 2015 opinion in Obergefell v.Hodges, which guaranteed same-sex couples the right to marry.In eleven incisive opinions, the authors offer the best constitutional arguments for and against the right to same-sex marriage, and. Case Analysis: Obergefell V. Hodges 1594 Words 7 Pages The future of same-sex marriage has long been a question in the United States; on June 26, 2015, under the U.S. Supreme Court decision of Obergefell v
OBERGEFELL v. HODGES Case Basics Docket No. 14-556 Petitioner James Obergefell, et al. Respondent Richard Hodges, Director of the Ohio Department of Health, et al. Consolidation 14-562, Tanco v. Haslam 14-571, DeBoer v. Snyder 14-574, Bourke v. Beshear Decided By Roberts Court (2010- ). CASES Adamson v. California, 332 U.S. 46 (1947).. 31 Akron v. Akron Center for Reproductive party authored this brief in whole or in part, and no person begins. Obergefell v. Hodges, 576 U.S. 644, 687-88 (2015) (Roberts, C.J., dissenting). CVEF, therefore, comes forward to support the right of States to restrict abortion pre. June 26th is the anniversary of the landmark United States Supreme Court decision, Obergefell v.Hodges, which made marriage equality the law of the land in the United States and confirmed that denying gay and lesbian couples the right to marry is unconstitutional.On this auspicious occasion, it is worth looking back to see how we got here and why the right to marry is so critical for many in.
Obergefell v. Hodges, 574 U.S. 644 (2015). Sample briefs of Obergefell v. Hodges: student's and Coughlin's! Th. April 22 (class 22!): George Floyd verdict, case briefing: Trivino v. Jamesway! Today's class notes! Yaire's presentation: Anatomy of a Case Brief! Court's decision in Trivino v There is no doubt Obergefell will go down as one of the most widely known decisions the Supreme Court has made, in fact, Obergefell, broke the record for most amicus curiae briefs filed with the court (Record Number Of Amicus Briefs Filed In Same-Sex-Marriage Cases, April 28, 2015) Baker v. Nelson (1972) Obergefell v. Hodges was a landmark decision United States Supreme Court case. The Court held that the recognition and provision of same-sex marriage is a fundamental right. They ruled it is guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution
Obergefell v Hodges conclusion -5 to 4 -The Court held that the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment guarantees the right to marry as one of the fundamental liberties it protects, and that analysis applies to same-sex couples in the same manner as it does to opposite-sex couples by Steve Sanders, who teaches constitutional law, constitutional litigation, and family law at the Indiana University Maurer School of Law.. He was co-counsel on the Human Rights Campaign's amicus brief in Obergefell v. Hodges. The mid-summer anniversaries of Supreme Court's marriage equality decisions, United States v.Windsor (2013) and Obergefell v It's official: Gay marriage is now a Constitutional right everywhere in America, thanks to the Supreme Court's landmark ruling in the Obergefell v.Hodges case on Friday. While there was a majority.
Obergefell v. Hodges, 576 U.S. ___, No. 14-556, slip op., *12 (2015). The decision came exactly two years after the Court held the Defense of Marriage Act, a federal law defining marriage as between one woman and one man, to be unconstitutional in United States v. Windsor, 133 S. Ct. 2675, 2696 (2013), and exactly twelve years after the Court. Obergefell v. Hodges, (U.S. Supreme Court, Slip No. 14-556. June 26, 2015). Legal rights previously enjoyed by traditional married couples upon the death or disability of a spouse are now available to same-sex spouses, putting them on the same level. These new rights arise not just in the event of a death of a same-sex spouse, but also in the.
James Obergefell v. Richard Hodges, No. 14-3057 (6th Cir. 2014) case opinion from the US Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circui Factual Sources in Obergefell v. Hodges. When examining evidence in . Obergefell, the Supreme Court drew upon a number of sources, including both past precedent and facts produced by . Amici Curiae. briefs. The Court used two types of precedent: binding precedent from Supreme Court cases and persuasive precedent from lower courts On June 26, 2015, the United States Supreme Court issued its monumental decision in Obergefell, et al. v. Hodges, et al.; Case No. 14-556, holding that state bans of same-sex marriages are. Part 8: 2015-MAR: Briefs sent to the U.S. Supreme Court by the Obama Administrations, various groups & individuals concerning SSM in the case Obergefell v. Hodges. Part 9: Some of the points raised in briefs submitted to the U.S. Supreme Court that advocate marriage equality. Part 10: Some briefs supporting or opposing marriage equalit Read the case of Obergefell v. Hodges, 576 U.S. ____(2015), and write a 4-5-page paper addressing the following: Summarize the plaintiffs' arguments that their substantive due process had been violated. Summarize the plaintiffs' argument that their rights to equal protection under the law had been violated. Explain the Court's ruling and any prior U.S. Supreme Court [ Hodges and Obergefell v. Hodges arguing that Ohio's ban on recognizing the legal marriages of same-sex couples violates the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses of the U.S. Constitution. Here's what you need to know about the brief: 1. It was filed in two Ohio federal cases: Henry v. Hodges and Obergefell v. Hodges